Traduction de «regola d'oro della liquidità bancaria » (Italien → Anglais) :

16. RECALLS the urgency the December European Council has put on moving towards a more integrated financial framework, including through finalising the negotiations with the European Parliament on the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) and bank capital and liquidity (CRD IV and CRR), on the basis of the position agreed by the Council, and reaching a swift agreement in the Council on the deposit guarantee and bank resolution proposals, to provide a more effective framework for the prevention and management of financial crises; and tha ...[+++]t, when an effective SSM is established, the ESM will have the possibility, following a regular decision, to recapitalize banks in the euro area directly; REAFFIRMS that action is under way at the EU level to address possible distortions within regulation and supervision systems, including in view of reducing the fragmentation of markets which has in some cases resulted in limited and/or inappropriately costly access to lending.

31. Recognises the important role played by money market funds (MMFs) in the financing of financial institutions in the short run and in allowing for risk diversification; recognises the different role and structure of MMFs based in the EU and the US; recognises that the 2010 ESMA guidelines imposed stricter standards on MMFs (credit quality, maturity of underlying securities and better disclosure to investors); notes, however, that some MMFs, in particular those offering a stable net asset value to investors, are vulnerable to massive runs; stresses, therefore, that additional measures need to be taken to improve the resilience of these funds and to ...[+++]cover the liquidity risk; supports the October 2012 IOSCO final report in its proposed recommendations for the regulation and management of MMFs across jurisdictions; believes that MMFs that offer a stable net asset value (NAV) should be subject to measures designed to reduce the specific risks associated with their stable NAV feature and internalise the costs arising from these risks; considers that regulators should require, where workable, a conversion to floating/variable NAV, or, alternatively, safeguards should be introduced to reinforce stable NAV MMFs’ resilience and ability to face significant redemptions; invites the Commission to submit a review of the UCITS framework, with particular focus on the MMF issue, in the first half of 2013, by requiring MMFs either to adopt a variable asset value with a daily evaluation or, if retaining a constant value, to be obliged to apply for a limited-purpose banking licence and be subject to capital and other prudential requirements; stresses that regulatory arbitrage must be minimised;

The result has been an improvement, with the European Central Bank understandably acting to ensure bank liquidity, first and foremost, and access to loans by companies.

In any event, it is now obvious that the current process of reform of the Commission has not sufficiently clarified the relative responsibilities of the Directors-General and the Commissioners and has given no guarantees of respect for the golden rule of democracy: that accountability and ultimate responsibility rest with political office-holders.

– (NL) Madam President, when it comes to financial management, the following holds true: trust is good but control is better.

(b) to establish general guidelines to be followed by each of them, in particular as regards the trend of bank liquidity, the terms for supply of credit and the level of interest rates;