Traduction de «Falso in atto pubblico » (Italien → Anglais) :

The ‘authenticity’ of an authentic instrument should be an autonomous concept covering elements such as the genuineness of the instrument, the formal prerequisites of the instrument, the powers of the authority drawing up the instrument and the procedure under which the instrument is drawn up.

When determining the evidentiary effects of a given authentic instrument in another Member State or the most comparable effects, reference should be made to the nature and the scope of the evidentiary effects of the authentic instrument in the Member State of origin.

It is alleged that, in the course of an altercation in a public car-park, he wrongfully accused an officer of the municipal police of Pozzilli (Italy) of illegal conduct, by asserting that she had falsified the times concerned when booking several drivers whose vehicles were parked in contravention of road traffic laws.

An authentic act also has enhanced probative force and is enforceable.

Community institutions and bodies would take into account the outcome of the public participation in taking a decision on a plan or programme relating to the environment and inform the public about it; databases or registers should include information on steps taken in proceedings for infringement of Community law; a delay of 15 working days for an answer from the Community institutions or bodies to a request for access to information would be established; Community institutions and bodies have to interpret any grounds for refusing access to informatio ...[+++]n in a restrictive way, taking into account the public interest served by disclosure and whether the information relates to emissions into the environment; extension to eight weeks of the delay to receive comments from the public to plans and programmes; extension to six weeks of the delay for any non-governmental organisation to present a request for the review of a Community act; the regulation would be applicable 9 month after its entry into force.

When it adopted its common position, the Council decided to disclose the following statements: (i) Statement on the recital referring to the general principle of open access to networks: "The Council and the Commission note that, according to the conclusions of the G7 Ministerial Conference on the Information Society, open access should be regulated by a framework preventing the abuse of dominant positions and constituting part of a future comprehensive regulatory framework for information services in a liberalized market structure, comprising competition in the field of services and infrastructures, the supply of universal services, the interconnectability of networks and a fair and effective system for issuing licences" (ii)Statement on t ...[+++]he provision whereby Member States shall facilitate the transfer of wide-screen television services already in operation to digital transmission networks open to the public: "The Council TAKES NOTE of the statement made by the Commission during the debate on the adoption of this amendment in the European Parliament, to the effect that it interprets this text as not imposing binding obligations on Member States regarding the transfer of wide- screen television services already in operation to digital transmission networks open to the public and it ENDORSES that interpretation.